The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) on Sunday took a swipe at the National Assembly over its decision on the electronic transmission of election results.
The National Publicity Secretary of the NBA, Rapulu Nduka, in an interview with one of our correspondents, said the decision to attach conditions to the electronic transmission of election results had whittled down the powers of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
Also, some senior lawyers said the lawmakers had tampered with the independence of the electoral commission with their decision.
But the Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Babafemi Ojudu, in an interview with journalists on Sunday, defended the Senate, saying issues raised by the lawmakers should be considered.
On Thursday, the Senate voted that the Nigerian Communications Commission, with the National Assembly’s approval, would determine whether INEC could transmit results electronically or not.
On Friday, the House of Representatives passed the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, maintaining the controversial Clause 52(2) as presented amidst protests, especially by members of the minority caucus.
The clause gives INEC the discretion to determine when, where and how voting and transmission of results will be done.
But the NBA spokesman, Rapulu Nduka, described the decision of the lawmakers, particularly senators, as selfish.
He stated, “The senators and our lawmakers in general are trying to make laws that benefit them at the moment. As far as I am concerned, not electronically transmitting these election results is a terribly myopic way of thinking. It is sad that people just make decisions or laws based on how they suit them.
“Some senators even stated that they did not have network service in their areas. I believe that is just an excuse. Telecommunications companies are profit-oriented. They should be able to provide network service to Internet-deprived areas. I am certain that those who benefit from a system, no matter how selfish, may face the consequences tomorrow.
N’Assembly has tied INEC hands, belittled commission – Lawyers’ association
“The reality is that the legislature has the constitutional power to make laws. However, making a law like this may be a way to tie the hands of the Independent National Electoral Commission, prevent the commission from doing the needful and belittle their powers guaranteed by the constitution. Nigerians are not happy about this. The law should be made for man and not man for the law.
“Our legislators must take into cognisance how just the laws are, how they affect the citizens and whether Nigerians are happy about them. These are some of the factors that should propel the making of laws in a democratic system.”
Any legislation that whittles down INEC’s independence unconstitutional – SAN
On his part, Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN) recalled that the president of the Senate, Dr Ahmad Lawan, had made it clear from the beginning that whatever President, Muhammadu Buhari wanted, the lawmakers would give him.
He added, “I can recall the obscene spectacle of the Deputy Senate President kneeling down to greet President Buhari. So, when you see such characters presiding over the affairs of the National Assembly, you have no choice but to take whatever decisions they make with a pinch of salt.
“I think the National Assembly is taking Nigerians for a ride. The Independent National Electoral Commission is a creation of the constitution. Therefore, any attempt to create any legislation, whether out of ignorance or mischief, which is unconstitutional should be struck down. Any legislation that whittles down the independence of INEC should be discouraged.
“The action of the National Assembly is a joke carried too far. If President Buhari signs that legislation into law, it will be challenged.”
Also, Yusuf Ali (SAN) said some of the functions of INEC revolved around things that would ensure electoral integrity, including everything that must be done to modernise the voting system.
He added, “The electronic transmission of election results should not be an issue at this stage and I am truly surprised that the National Assembly is not in support of it. We are in the age of information, communications and technology. If the National Assembly does not have any hidden agenda, then I don’t see any reason why we cannot electronically transmit our election results.
“INEC must be thoroughly independent as its name connotes. When it comes to disputes in election matters, the commission should be given the discretion to utilise cutting-edge technology in our electoral processes.”
Taiwo Osipitan (SAN), stated, “The independence of INEC means that it is not to be interfered with in the conduct of its business. We all know that the majority of us are in support of the electronic transmission of election results. This is because we are in a technological age and transmitting election results electronically would make it difficult for people to rig elections. We all want a good law and any legislation which is in support of this would be termed a good law.
“Therefore, we all need to mount pressure on the National Assembly for them to see reasons why they should pass a good law ensuring that election results are electronically transmitted.”
Another SAN, Remi Olatubora, stressed the need for the independence of INEC to be encouraged to electronically transfer election results.
Olatubora in a telephone interview in Abuja, on Sunday said, “There should be electronic transmission of election results. We conduct voters’ verification with the card reader. That is an electronic verification of voters.”
But the Special Adviser to the President on Political Matters, Ojudu, said the issues raised by the lawmakers before taking their decision on the matter should be considered.
Ojudu stated this in an interview with journalists at the International Conference Centre, Abuja, during the investiture of the 12th President of Rotary Club of Abuja Metro, Dupe Abosede.
He said, “Well, I don’t know why that happened, but I guess listening to the debate on the floor, listening to the NCC officials who came, it could just be as a result of technical considerations.
“They are saying that in some parts of the country, connectivity could be very slow, connectivity could be very unreliable, and if you have to move the results to another area where there is connectivity, something could happen on the way.
“And I think they also raised the issues of hackers, that even in America, with its technological perfection, hackers hacked results in some parts of America during the last election. I think that could have been the consideration for that. I have no personal opinion about that, but that is their decision.”
Asked about Nigerians who were saying that the APC rejected e-transmission because it wanted to rig elections, Ojudu said, “No o…!!! We don’t have to rig. We will go out and vigorously campaign.
“There is no belief that the APC is a party that rigs elections. If we do, we wouldn’t have allowed the PDP to have Zamfara, Bauchi, Adamawa, Oyo and others. That couldn’t have happened under the PDP.” – Punch.
